Here's the tradeoff, as I see it, between blogging and Facebook:
Blogging advantages:
Blogging advantages:
- No significant restrictions on length of entries or comments.
- Postings and comments older than a day remain easily accessible, unlike Facebook postings that are quickly buried and forgotten within a few hours under an avalanche of new submissions.
- A more sustained and focused dialog is possible, and in much greater depth.
- Can serve as a journal, a place where compulsive writers (like me) can process what interests them, or seems important, on any given day. Audience size matters little from this perspective.
- Minuscule audiences (if any), with rare exceptions. Quality and audience size don't necessarily correlate, as some of my favorite blogs demonstrate.
- Regular entries, ideally every day, are needed to encourage visits. But the incentive to make regular submissions declines as the number of readers stagnates: a demoralizing feedback loop.
- Difficult to promote, even with RSS feeds and other devices, due to the overwhelming number of blogs on every conceivable subject.
- Standard blog formats are often boring, and many of us lack the HTML skills needed to create our own.
- In theory, a chance to enter into an instant dialog with Friends (just 87 in my case, a very modest total compared to most users);
- Little effort required to submit original postings or repost articles, videos and photos;
- Constant, and often very lively, interactions promote a sense of community.
- Entries limited in length, unless you use the message function -- essentially the equivalent of private email.
- Exchanges tend to be in snippets, with an emphasis on witty but often superficial comments.
- Difficult to sustain any focus in conversations due to the distracting onslaught of information from all directions.
No comments:
Post a Comment